July 4th happened, alright? I just wanted to take a day off... well, more accurately, Civ V happened. I didn't even realize I had the thing installed until yesterday, and it went badly for me. Like, sick to the stomach today badly. Anyway...
Font size got smaller. Still a lot of text... I think the issue is pacing, maybe? I'm trying to cram myself from point A to point B within a page, because webcomic pages just look weird without a conclusion, a pun, or a cliffhanger at the end.
A blog that records game design ideas, showcases art and webcomics, and talks about everything in between
Thursday, July 5, 2012
Tuesday, July 3, 2012
Rant Tuesday: Don't Stand So Close to Me
As a continuation of sorts from last week's rant, I've taken some consideration on the other side of useless information that I collect a lot... personal information. Whether it's from Twitter,Facebook, or Reddit, they're all inane slice of life messages from people famous for doing something totally unrelated to their daily life. Looking over my tweets, in terms of getting tweets about things that I can learn and use improve my craft, the signal to noise ratio is about... 4%? and that's on a good day.
What it does, though, it make me feel so impersonally personal that I admire. I'm nowhere near these people geographically, but when I read about their daily routine it is as if I am their roommate or office buddy, watching their every move. We've gone from a daily entry in LiveJornal to the hourly updates of MySpace and Facebook to the minute updates of Twitter. With every increase in frequency we're that much closer to one another.
And that closeness creates tremendous friction. For people with tens of thousands of followers, each twitter account is just an incubation chamber waiting to explode. Unscreened by publicists and instantly connected to fans and haters, there had been many instances where in the heat of the moment respectable people end up tweeting horrible things, and because everyone is still coming to grip with the fact that all writings on the internet are public and permanent, the disaster explodes instantly over all the relevant media outlets.
Twitter is a useful tool... it's a amazing way to get a one-to-many message across the entire network. However, I think it's being used altogether too much right now. Don't stand so close to me - if you speak, please say something that I'd need to think about!
What it does, though, it make me feel so impersonally personal that I admire. I'm nowhere near these people geographically, but when I read about their daily routine it is as if I am their roommate or office buddy, watching their every move. We've gone from a daily entry in LiveJornal to the hourly updates of MySpace and Facebook to the minute updates of Twitter. With every increase in frequency we're that much closer to one another.
And that closeness creates tremendous friction. For people with tens of thousands of followers, each twitter account is just an incubation chamber waiting to explode. Unscreened by publicists and instantly connected to fans and haters, there had been many instances where in the heat of the moment respectable people end up tweeting horrible things, and because everyone is still coming to grip with the fact that all writings on the internet are public and permanent, the disaster explodes instantly over all the relevant media outlets.
Twitter is a useful tool... it's a amazing way to get a one-to-many message across the entire network. However, I think it's being used altogether too much right now. Don't stand so close to me - if you speak, please say something that I'd need to think about!
Monday, July 2, 2012
Design Diary Monday: Papercraft and Player Boards and Ships, Oh My!
When I thought I've designed my card game to my corner, I've considered my options and I've decided to make some changes, radical changes. So many changes that only things remained were the two principles of rock-paper-scissors ship battle and the use of the pirate dice. Well, that actually fixed a lot of things in place. So how different could the new iteration look? Well...
Behold, CUBES!
Instead of ships being represented by ship cards, the players actually have paper ships... the pirate and cannon crew cards became pirate and cannon cubes. Treasure from the locations? Cubes. The only thing that remained cards were the locations and the single use voodoo cards. Instead of forming ship and crew with cards, you loaded cubes into your ship... when attacking, you added cubes to your ships. Ship to ship combat still revolved around the strategy cards, but the cubes determine the dice numbers when cannon or melee rolls were made.
The changes looked good in theory. It radically redefined what information was hidden and what was known since you can't put treasure or crew cards face down. Treasure hunting also became very eurogameish when players basically look for the best way to obtain the most treasure in the current round. Ship to ship combat was available to throw players seriously off-balance when necessary.
Unfortunately, the radical change of appearance was accompanied by rule changes that broke the system: for example,
Behold, CUBES!
Instead of ships being represented by ship cards, the players actually have paper ships... the pirate and cannon crew cards became pirate and cannon cubes. Treasure from the locations? Cubes. The only thing that remained cards were the locations and the single use voodoo cards. Instead of forming ship and crew with cards, you loaded cubes into your ship... when attacking, you added cubes to your ships. Ship to ship combat still revolved around the strategy cards, but the cubes determine the dice numbers when cannon or melee rolls were made.
The changes looked good in theory. It radically redefined what information was hidden and what was known since you can't put treasure or crew cards face down. Treasure hunting also became very eurogameish when players basically look for the best way to obtain the most treasure in the current round. Ship to ship combat was available to throw players seriously off-balance when necessary.
Unfortunately, the radical change of appearance was accompanied by rule changes that broke the system: for example,
- A new rule was added to encourage risk taking, where if you decided to haul your treasures in, you'd lose your shot at the rest of the treasures on the table. It forced every player to stay at sea for as long as possible, and created some truly bizarre scenarios where every single ship from every player destroyed each other completely, ending a turn with zero treasure taken.
- The sea combat rules were patched to a ridiculous degree to accommodate for the possibility of ships attacking without cannons, exasperated by loopholes around the evade->broadside counter. If evading cannons meant starting a new turn without changing the state of the game, a player with a ship without cannons but with superior pirate count could simply evade to force the game into an infinite loop. If evading cannons grant the player without cannons a chance to pursue (which broadside normally beats), then it weakens the usefulness of broadsiding. This might be hard to explain without the rest of the rules, but imagine if paper beating rock only resulted in a draw... or paper can transform to rock when faced with scissors. Any patchwork solution that me and my friend could come up with ended up short.
among other things. As a result, I believed the noble experiment of radically changing the game to a board game failed... but changing the game's format gave me a lot of insight about the workings of the core mechanics, namely that the pirate/cannon strength numbers play an extremely important role in combat and should not be arbitrarily quantized; that the treasures were not interesting enough to form a eurogame system around; that forcing players to take too much risk for removed real choices. Those were all lessons that I took to heart as I humbly remove all the cubes from the game and transform everything back into card game format.
Next week: heavy consolidation.
Friday, June 29, 2012
Art Friday: Pirate Grenadier
Probably will work a little harder to bring out the "happy psychotic" expression if I get a chance to go back on this... otherwise, this is pretty fun. If her card stays in the game, it's suppose to be a pretty big game changer.
Thursday, June 28, 2012
Music Thursday: It's... Something
The title says it all. Unlike the things that I do on the other weekdays, I've never had any real experience producing music in any capacity; I dabble with trackers once every blue moon and that's about it. It's going to take a long time before I can produce anything worth listening to on this "two hours per day" schedule. Nevertheless, I'll leave the things that I've done here as a reminder that next week I should probably try a little harder.
Wednesday, June 27, 2012
Webcomic Wednesday: Future Sight P2
Shifting webcomics to Wednesdays because... alliteration! Plus it'll be easier on my schedule, I think.
Tuesday, June 26, 2012
Rant Tuesday: I Probably Know Too Much
It's a silly notion, isn't it? And not in the spy movie "I'm going to be killed now because of my knowledge of some sensitive information". I just mean information in general. I've been pondering about the fact that there's so few topics I can come up with when I talk to people nowadays. And it's not for a lack of reading things - I read so much, in fact, that it's sometimes distracting to my real work, but that's a story for another day.
The thing is, with near instant access I have to the internet, there's not a lot of reason for me to retain information anymore. I'll be the first person to admit that having almost any question answered at my fingertips saved my job and enriched my life in more ways than one (mostly in the form of delicious recipes) but again, keeping that same information in my brain does nothing for me.
Ironically, I still find it incredibly difficult to hold down a conversation, just because the things I look up and read about are so disconnected. For example, a youtube video led me to another video which led me to look up the background song "Living in the Sunlight" which led me to Tiny Tim and what looks like the first episode of Spongebob Squarepants. How do I even begin to bring up stuff like this in a conversation?
The thing is, with near instant access I have to the internet, there's not a lot of reason for me to retain information anymore. I'll be the first person to admit that having almost any question answered at my fingertips saved my job and enriched my life in more ways than one (mostly in the form of delicious recipes) but again, keeping that same information in my brain does nothing for me.
Ironically, I still find it incredibly difficult to hold down a conversation, just because the things I look up and read about are so disconnected. For example, a youtube video led me to another video which led me to look up the background song "Living in the Sunlight" which led me to Tiny Tim and what looks like the first episode of Spongebob Squarepants. How do I even begin to bring up stuff like this in a conversation?
Monday, June 25, 2012
Design Diary Monday: Let the Pirating Begin
After the design process for Summoner went badly, I wanted another shot at designing a Magic like game. I dropped the "design a card" mechanic and returned to cards with fixed powers and abilities. Then I introduced two new X-factors: the rock paper scissors combat that is broadside/evade/pursue, and pirates dice with special dice faces. By the time of this writing, I've thrown away and reused the majority of the card sleeves for later iterations of the game, so here's just a tiny sample of how the game used to look like:
The players were pirates trying to control as much treasure (yellow cards) as possible by the end of the game. Each player controlled a hand of pirate crew (white cards) and several pirate ships (blue cards). In the beginning of each round, a set number of treasure was added to each location (green cards) on the board. Players took turns attacking locations by forming a ship and crew where the total rum use of the crew must not exceed the rum supply of the ship (the circled numbers). A ship loaded with treasure was considered sailing at sea and was open to other player's attacks.
Combat mainly revolved around the broadside/evade/pursue strategy cards. Each player chose a strategy and revealed them at the same time, and the general resolution was broadside beat pursue, pursue beat evade, evade beat broadside. Several strategy combinations would require tossing dice equal to the strength numbers (numbers next to cannons and cutlass icons) to resolve, such as a broadside exchange. Almost all cards had special abilities attached: the crew, the ships, and even some treasures could modify some part of the game. Putting the ship and crew together made the game interesting, but ultimately it also made the game too difficult to track.
To be fair, this version of the game was great for two players, with reasonable downtime and a manageable amount of information to track. The game got too complex once it scaled up to three or more players, though, and I personally lost track of my crew abilities while testing a four player game. When that happened, I was convinced that some dramatic pruning of game mechanics was necessary to scale the game up to my goal of six total players.
In fact, the next version had so much change that it felt like the game took a wrecking ball in its face. Next week: what happened? Paper ships and cubes?
The players were pirates trying to control as much treasure (yellow cards) as possible by the end of the game. Each player controlled a hand of pirate crew (white cards) and several pirate ships (blue cards). In the beginning of each round, a set number of treasure was added to each location (green cards) on the board. Players took turns attacking locations by forming a ship and crew where the total rum use of the crew must not exceed the rum supply of the ship (the circled numbers). A ship loaded with treasure was considered sailing at sea and was open to other player's attacks.
Combat mainly revolved around the broadside/evade/pursue strategy cards. Each player chose a strategy and revealed them at the same time, and the general resolution was broadside beat pursue, pursue beat evade, evade beat broadside. Several strategy combinations would require tossing dice equal to the strength numbers (numbers next to cannons and cutlass icons) to resolve, such as a broadside exchange. Almost all cards had special abilities attached: the crew, the ships, and even some treasures could modify some part of the game. Putting the ship and crew together made the game interesting, but ultimately it also made the game too difficult to track.
To be fair, this version of the game was great for two players, with reasonable downtime and a manageable amount of information to track. The game got too complex once it scaled up to three or more players, though, and I personally lost track of my crew abilities while testing a four player game. When that happened, I was convinced that some dramatic pruning of game mechanics was necessary to scale the game up to my goal of six total players.
In fact, the next version had so much change that it felt like the game took a wrecking ball in its face. Next week: what happened? Paper ships and cubes?
Saturday, June 23, 2012
Webcomic Friday: Future Sight P1
Less than a week in, and I've missed a day already! Looks like there's still some kinks I need to work out. The original plan was to do a game review on Thursdays, and with over 200 games in my Steam library that would have lasted a while... but I just can't bring myself to writing it. There's already enough of those "one man's opinion" reviews out in the wild that adding to the noise really does nothing for me. So I'll be posting my attempts at composing music on Thursdays instead. It'll be a pain since I am nowhere as adapt in whipping out music compared to what I do for the other days of the week, but it'll be a good learning experience if I can keep it up.
As for today:
"Future Sight" is one of the many potential webcomic projects that I wanted to do "one of those days". I guess that day is now. I'm not sure if I'll ever be able to ink or color these, but I want to get a flow going and some page is better than no page at all. Besides, if I skip two days in a row on the first week, that'd be really bad...
Wednesday, June 20, 2012
Art Wednesday: Pirate Swashbuckler
Well, the idea was to complete a drawing, color and all, by the end of the day... I guess my drawing hands are just super rusty nowadays. If I have time in the evenings, I'll see if I can get it colored.
Tuesday, June 19, 2012
Rant Tuesday: Being the Minority of a Democracy Sucks
Rant Tuesdays are for... ranting. Maybe one day I'll actually do my research, but it's just more therapeutic to spout vaguely supported ideas based on questionable statistics, verifiability be damned. Today's inspiration:
Being the minority in a democratic state sucks.
We've had our primaries recently, and as I have discovered since I've started voting, a few initiatives of questionable importance are being put on the ballot every time California holds an election of any sort. And as expected, the ballot results are not what I wanted.
I keep feeling like I'm wasting my time leafing through the election guide pamphlet and actually reading the text of the laws. Who gives a damn whether I've actually come to an informed decision or not, I only have one vote and if the result turns out one way instead of the other none of it really matters. It's not like if a vote goes 51% to 49% (as most propositions end up being), then the actual policy is suppose to meet halfway between one solution and another. Nope. It means half the people are happy and the other half gets screwed. Guess which end of the stick I'm more likely to be on.
It's not like I can really make a change either. I'm a firm believer that intelligent debate is useless. People will pay you lip service for you to get off their backs, but their anonymous vote won't change. If you want an actual behavior change, you either deceive or threaten. Otherwise why bother? I like my opinion better than yours, I don't care if it's prejudiced or factually incorrect, I'm comfortable with what I believe and no amount of truth or reasoning changes that. It's the path of least resistance. Funny thing, a majority of people like taking that path.
So I'm basically stuck. I can either choose to be blissfully ignorant or principally discontent. In the end, happiness be damned, you can pry my principles out of my cold, dead hand. That, and the single vote that I still have... and if the majority has anything to say about it, something I might actually lose in my lifetime, and wouldn't it be a bitch when that happens.
Being the minority in a democratic state sucks.
We've had our primaries recently, and as I have discovered since I've started voting, a few initiatives of questionable importance are being put on the ballot every time California holds an election of any sort. And as expected, the ballot results are not what I wanted.
I keep feeling like I'm wasting my time leafing through the election guide pamphlet and actually reading the text of the laws. Who gives a damn whether I've actually come to an informed decision or not, I only have one vote and if the result turns out one way instead of the other none of it really matters. It's not like if a vote goes 51% to 49% (as most propositions end up being), then the actual policy is suppose to meet halfway between one solution and another. Nope. It means half the people are happy and the other half gets screwed. Guess which end of the stick I'm more likely to be on.
It's not like I can really make a change either. I'm a firm believer that intelligent debate is useless. People will pay you lip service for you to get off their backs, but their anonymous vote won't change. If you want an actual behavior change, you either deceive or threaten. Otherwise why bother? I like my opinion better than yours, I don't care if it's prejudiced or factually incorrect, I'm comfortable with what I believe and no amount of truth or reasoning changes that. It's the path of least resistance. Funny thing, a majority of people like taking that path.
So I'm basically stuck. I can either choose to be blissfully ignorant or principally discontent. In the end, happiness be damned, you can pry my principles out of my cold, dead hand. That, and the single vote that I still have... and if the majority has anything to say about it, something I might actually lose in my lifetime, and wouldn't it be a bitch when that happens.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
-
So I've been a proud owner of an HTC Vive for about two months now, and I've had my share of demos to friends and family alike. W...


.jpg)



